Appropriation Limit for the Yucaipa Valley Water District

In the 1970s soaring property values in California led to dramatic increases in property taxes, prompting a tax revolt that resulted in the passage of Proposition 13 in the June 1978 California primary.  Proposition 13 reduced local property taxes by 57% and thereby slashed the revenue base for local governments and schools.  Over the years the revenue loss has been made up by a varying mix of state funds and new revenue from specialized local fees and taxes, as well as by outright local budget cuts.

The California tax revolt did not end with Proposition 13.  Seventeen months later, in November 1979, voters passed the Proposition 4, known as the Gann Amendment.  Proposition 4 imposed a limit on most state and local government expenditures from tax sources.  The limit is calculated annually according to a formula based on population and the cost of living.  Under Proposition 4, excess revenues must be returned to the taxpayers. 

Both Propositions 13 and 4 have been modified in the years since their passage.  While weakened by the changes, Propositions 13 and 4 remain constraints on California state and local budgeting, and continue to be focal points in the public policy debate about California taxing and spending.

Appropriation Limitation Methodology